EMPIRICAL PROOF OF LIBERAL/PRO-OBAMA MEDIA BIAS (among other things such as protofascism, rigging the market and classic self-dealing)

As if any additional proof was needed! However, consider the following:

Case 1: Bill Clinton demands and receives the resignation of all Federal District Attorneys. The 'Big Media' sees nothing irregular in this. After all , the President has a right to pick his team, right? Of course, law enforcement officers, and especially officers of the court, are supposed to be impartial and apolitical, not on any 'side' or 'team'.

Fast forward to the Bush Administration and the AG Gonzalez scandal. Remember the uproar (and subsequent resignation of AG Gonzalez) when it was alleged that there might have been 'political' reasons for the requests for resignations from the DAs? Of course, Clinton was smarter than Bush in requiring ALL the attorneys to resign en masse. (Democrats are better than the Republicans in wielding the levers of power, remember?)




Now, Obama is reported to be closing auto dealerships based on political affiliation, i.e., REPUBLICAN dealerships are being closed. And there is no general uproar.

Draw your own conclusions.

Obama and his ilk are worthy of the Kingfisher (Huey Long, former governor of Louisiana)---or either Mayor Daley.

Liberal fascism is closer than you think- it's here! The news outlets report it every day- and of great concern, most don't give it a second thought.

Speaking of 'giving it a thought'= aside for the overt corruption of closing dealers on a partisan basis, might Obama Inc., who now owns a majority of GM, be shortcutting potential competition as well. Triangulation at its 'finest'!


M.C.